WP2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

WP2 - Essay ExampleOn the other hand, critics of science assert that technologies such as transmitted engineering are threat to benevolence and contravene societal values and morality, thus creating a tussle between science and society.In swear the Future? Ethics of Human Genetic Modification (Op-Ed), Stephanie Saulter explores the extent to which the modern society can cuss the future for making the right decision about human genetic modification (Saulter 1). The implication is that the real society attaches too many ethical concerns for genetic engineering of humans though there has been a tremendous success in assisted reproduction and Mitochondria replacements. Saulter argues that the current taboo-driven objection to using technology to put up diversity is unjustified because of the possibility of the human race depending on this technology to maintain its existence and repeal extinction of certain genetic attributes. The topic is about genetic modification of altering hu man genes to cleanse our fragile health. The term focused on reproductive and genetic medicine whereby mothers with high risk of genetic disorder through natural conception are given invitro fertilization or pre-implantation tissue to mouth the defect. This eradicates mitochondrial diseases by replacing the mothers faulty mitochondrial DNA (mDNA) with healthy mDNA from a donor egg and in nub having a third DNA in the reproduction which cause a debate for its propriety. Even though many societies are resistant to technological advancements in the field of medicine, the technologies remain crucial part of extract technique of the human race. This paper explores Saulters arguments and delves further to offer response to the main ideas discussed by the author.The article provides enough arguments to address the rhetorical question of what the modern society should consider ethical or not ethical.