Classical Era Reflection Paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Classical duration Reflection - Research Paper ExampleThe major theorists of scientific (management) perspective believed there is one stovepipe way to do everything and that is the most efficient way Those theorists believed they could determine that method via whatever means they were victimization or purported was the best method to study the task. Those theorists of the scientific perspective discussed first are F. W. Taylor, H. L. Gantt, Frank and Lillian Gilbreth, and Hugo Munsterberg. Frederick W. Taylors philosophy led the way for many others in using scientific and mathematical methods applied to casters, attempting to distich a persons abilities to a job in the best way possible, instituting a plebeian self-interest mind-set that had never existed and improving employee productivity through incentives (Locke, 1982 Wren & Bedeian, 2009). Crain (2003) says that Taylor was noted for his scientific approach, his efficacy to solve problems, and his ability to invent thing s. His thought was that measurement increased productivity (p. 45). In one example, the trial subject increased production by 400 per cent while receiving 60 percent more(prenominal) in pay. Taylor was best known for his stopwatch, but he believed that money is what the workers craved and they were determined to observe it. Companies at that sentence glossed over the downside of Taylors efficiency gains and put increased productivity over ethics. philosophical discussions took place and he wrote about it in The Principles of Scientific Management. He believed that ultimately improving efficiency meliorate society. Hodgetts (1995) analyzed ten U.S. organizations against Taylors principles and found that each in its own way used Taylors four principles to help focus their total quality management strategy (p. 218). The four principles are summarized as follows 1. Develop a science for each part of a persons work, replacing a rule of thumb method (p. 218). 2. Scientifically pick a nd train employees rather than allow employees to arrive and work as they wish. 3. Cooperate with employees to ensure work is done according to scientific guidelines. 4. Divide work as equally as possible. Allow management time to oversee the work of the employees and shoulder the responsibility of dimension others accountable. Henry Laurence Gantt worked closely with F. W. Taylor. Gantt brought a human quality into the scientific side of Taylors work. Gantt developed a bonus pay structure for the employee who fatten upd their piece rate work for the day and was able to complete more than the assigned tasks. With Gantts methods of the use of incentives for employees production was often doubled (Wren & Bedeian, 2009, p. Fax 2). Frank Gilbreth differed from Taylor in that Gilbreth used time motion studies where Taylor used a stop watch and was using only time rather than time motion. Gilbreth was best known for establishing the hope of finding the one best (most efficient) way to d o any and every task (Wren & Bedeian, 2009). Lillian Gilbreth, PhD, continued the work the two of them conducted even after Franks death and she later became published. Hugo Munsterberg was the father of industrial psychology as we know it today. He believed psychological themes could be applied in the workplace. In 2009, The New Yorker published an article describing in detail the events of Classical