Should the Ruler Always Keep His Word Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Should the Ruler Always Keep His Word - Essay ExampleIt is possible to present mightiness from an unusual perspective. This task was the most relevant to Machiavelli and he managed to open the eyes of his fans and follower and the coming generations on the real essence of power, and on power of the words. In the majority of cases Princes atomic number 18 focussed on their own interests. They are selfish and prudent they do not care about their people at all. Machiavelli has been focused on the relevance of the ruler and the meaning of his word. Further on this paper considers controversial and challenging moments of the statement that a ruler should not keep his word. A word of a ruler Machiavelli inspires readers. They love him for sincerity, unexpected expressions, feelings and emotions. Machiavelli claims One ought not, of course, to call itvirtuto massacre nonpareils fellow citizens, to betray ones friends, to break ones word, to be without mercy and without religion. By such means one send packing acquire power but not rejoice (Prince online). Nowadays, the majority of politicians are focused on power. They consider it as an enormous blessing and there is no doubt that even the modern politicians cannot look go on than their nose. Machiavelli and his feeling of patriotism, multiplied by a possibility to exist among other politicians and clerk were the main triggers for further developments of his political ideas. Actually, Machiavelli described people as get the hang and slaves. A former group of people is more powerful and it is appropriate for them to take care about themselves only. Slaves, or common people, in accordance with Machiavelli, are narrow-minded and follow the laws of the ruler, like an obedient herd of ships (Bagley, 1989). Therefore, it is possible to suggest, that Machiavelli wants to describe a dual nature of a human being. There are 2 origins in the nature of every man on the one hand, we choose What classical writers intended t o convey, with this story of rulers being educated by someone who was half zoology and half man, was that it is necessary for a ruler to know when to act like an animal and when like a man and if he relies on just one or the other mode of behavior he cannot hope to survive (Prince online). This explanation can be correlated with a developed system of people, i.e. master and Slaves (Alter, 1999). Masters know how to behave with their slaves they impose perverted laws on them and they have no doubts that their Slaves would follow all their needs and wants. When it goes about Masters words or the ways of behavior, they have sharp minds and can easily choose appropriate strategies and the ways of behavior. A Master uses beasty features, turns into a lion and can easily crucify his enemies. A Master turns into a fox, when he wants to conduct his cunning laws and create traps for his Slaves. On the one hand, it is appropriate for a ruler to choose different strategies of behavior. other than it is impossible to reign. On the other hand, what can be said about a ruler if he does not keep his word? He can lose respect and trust of his people. Only a feeling of fear can prevent people from real protesting. In this case, the Prince can behave in whatever he wants, because he will get no resistance from people around him. There are many things, which are permitted for the king, but these whole shebang are forbidden for a slave. Machiavelli claims that there are many sins and every man