In what ways is Orwell's Keep the Aspidistra Flying a critique of Essay

In what ways is Orwells Keep the Aspidistra Flying a review of British values between the wars - Essay ExampleEven from above you could see that his shoes requisite resoling. (Orwell, 2002) This makes it obvious to the reader that Gordon is a piece of music who is down on his luck. The book can be construe in terms of reflecting on the values of the British society especially between the war period. unluckily Gordon has some rattling unattractive qualities which make it difficult for the reader to identify with him. He is a man obsessed with himself and wallowing in self-pity. He has a lot of intellectual arrogance and conceit. He professes to be a budding poet although his book has only sold about one hundred and fifty three copies. He firmly believes that it is only the lack of capital which prevents him from turning out a masterpiece. In his own linguistic communication Snooty, refined books on safe painters and safe poets by those moneyed young beasts who glide so graciou sly from Eton to Cambridge and from Cambridge to the literary reviews. (Orwell, 2002) Here Gordons contempt for writers who do not dare to take any assortment of risk but prefer to stick to safe topics is obvious. At the same condemnation a corpuscle of envy is there in his words. He considers that their moneyed background offers these writers a blanket of security which is conspicuously lacking in his life. genuinely through Gordons monologue we catch a glimpse of British Society during the post-war period. The British middle class values are also high-lighted in this book. It was a very class conscious society at that clipping. The British middle class had certain rigid standards by which they lived their lives. Thus at that time you were either a gentleman or an aristocrat. If you belonged to neither of these two categories wherefore you were a member of the lower classes and you could expect to be treated with a certain degree of contempt. Actually here the author has es say to bring to the fore-front the false sense of values which governed the British Society in those days. So we see that although Gordon Comstock had no money he was still desperate to keep up appearances. For ideal in this passage, Gordon walked homeward against the rattling wind, which blew his hair backward and gave him more of a good forehead than ever. His manner conveyed to the passers-by--at least, he hoped it did--that if he wore no overcoat it was from pure caprice. His overcoat was up the spout for fifteen shillings, as a matter of fact. (Orwell, 2002) Here Gordons behavior is typical of the class to which he belonged. He did not sustain an overcoat and at the same time he was trying to convey the impression that this was just strange behavior on his part. There were one or two bright spots in Gordons life. One was his girlfriend Rosemary who loved him but refused to sleep with him. The other was his rich friend Philip Ravelston who tried to help him by publishing one of his books through his publishing contacts. Gordon formed the impression that his lack of money was the main reason behind Rosemarys resistance to his advances. Although Gorden claimed to disdain money, at the same time he was obsessed with it. This is apparent from this passage. It wasnt merely the lack of money. It was rather that, having no money, they still lived mentally in the money-world--the world in which money is virtue and poverty is crime. (Orwell, 2002) Gordon had little or no time for his relatives. Their genteel poverty and their helplessness was a source of